As I have previously mentioned, I have walked down to check out my own city's Occupy. The first thing that I was taken aback by was the appearance. Set in a tree lined park, it nearly escaped my notice until I was nearly upon it. There it was in its stark grotesqueness, as if the park itself had sprouted up a case of versicolored pimples. Crowded in tightly together with clear pathways making a partial X through the encampment, it was muddy. It was dirty.The kitchen of the protest was thrown together by a variety of donated items, all hodge podge and uncoordinated. The library boasted a tiny little ramshackle bookcase. Rain soaked cardboard signs were everywhere and garbage bags filled with donated coats and blankets were piled against a tree. It was all so unsavory with the backdrop of my beautiful and pristine city with its shining skyscrapers and tree lined parks. A definite visual blight upon the eye.
As I stood there amidst it all, I felt a deep somberness overcome me. I had seen this image before but not inside a city and only from afar in pictures. What I was seeing within my beloved city of Portland was a tent city but not the tent cities of the Occupy protest. What I was seeing were the tent cities that we don't see. Outside of almost every major city in the United States is a tent city, an occupation that has been on going for the last several years since the collapse of the housing market. What these Occupy protesters have done by placing their own versions of these tent cities outside of city halls and within financial districts is brought the truth and harsh reality of our economic crisis and extreme disparity front and center.
In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Supreme Court ruled that black armbands worn by students in protest of the Vietnam War were also to be considered free speech. In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held that burning the US flag was free speech. The distinguishing factor for each of these cases is that these things were both symbolic expressions of opinion and an alternative to vocalization. This symbolic expression does not have to be beautiful or pleasing to the eye. As Justice Brennan wrote in his opinion on Texas v. Johnson, "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable."

Note: I still had the first image of a tent city on my monitor when my daughter came in the room and saw it. She asked me, all wide eyed, "is that downtown? is that Occupy?". Made me kind of sad that I had to tell her no, that's a real tent city. From the mouths of babes though, even a 9 year old caught the symbolism and import.
No comments:
Post a Comment